I'm curious (and not an APL2 user), does APL2 really have
something similar to x f\ y ?? What is the syntax?

- joey

At 10:38  +0000 2006/24/3, Mike Day wrote:
As you noted, John Randall's }: > }. is of interest. 2 >/\ ] is a natural J/APL2 way to do it, whereas }: > }. is the J
form of an ancient APL1 idiom for first differences and the like,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to