On 4/16/06, Dan Bron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> June,
>
> I find  (@:[)(^:])  unappealing.  I prefer the dyadic invocation of a bonded 
> monad, ie.  x m&v y  or  x u&n y  , particularly when
> the primary argument will be the number of iterations, and some seed data is 
> required for the intial iteration.
>
> See my earlier responses to this thread for an example.
>
> -Dan
>

Thank you for the direction but I could hardly get it.

I suppose the essence of what you are suggesting is:

   (100&(,~ *:^:_1)&256) <3
256   0   0
 16 100   0
  4  10 100

However, I couldn't get the hang of it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to