Jose Mario Quintana wrote: > Right, and the unfortunate consequence, for those of us that like > doing things tacitly, is that fixing tacit verbs involving $: > results in verbose hybrid verbs.
Well... you could propose a solution. For example, let's imagine an adjective $:. where f $:. is equivalent to f Furthermore, in the definition of f, the verb f $:. should be treated as if it were "named", for the purpose of resolving $: Thus, >:@($:@<:^:]$:.) 1 1 in contrast with >:@($:@<:^:]) 1 2 Feel free to propose something better (simpler, easier to understand, whatever), of course. -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
