Hello Roger;
Point taken. In fact, my attempt at reworking:
13 : ',x. i. y.'
[: , i.
doesn't apply because
(,x) {iota} y <=> , x {iota} y
is an identity that only works in APL.
Moral: {iota} is not i.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|\/| Randy A MacDonald | APL: If you can say it, it's done.. (ram)
|/\| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|\ | |If you cannot describe what you are doing
BSc(Math) UNBF'83 þas a process, you don't know what you're doing.
Sapere Aude | - W. E. Deming
Natural Born APL'er | Demo website: http://156.34.95.92/
-----------------------------------------------------(INTP)----{ gnat }-
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Hui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Programming forum" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Explicit-to-tacit query
Because it is not the same verb. , i. ] is
equivalent to (x,y) i. y . In fact:
13 : '(x,y) i. y'
, i. ]
----- Original Message -----
From: Randy MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, July 14, 2006 7:36 am
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Explicit-to-tacit query
Hello Roger;
Why not:
,i.]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roger Hui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Programming forum" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Explicit-to-tacit query
> 13 : n uses a set of heuristics to do its work.
> Sometimes you can do better than what it does.
> If I were translating (,x) i. y I would have
> written ,@[ i. ] .
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
