That was a result of posing a question "How would a fast C code look like?" and then translated to J.
Unfortunately, though it looks nice, it does not work fast in J. Whereas >./\ special coded, ([^:(0=]))/\ is not, although it is single scan tacit. As a result, more cumbersome multiscan algorithms perform faster. --- ramacd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That is truly beautiful. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Oleg Kobchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Programming forum" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:31 AM > Subject: RE: [Jprogramming] What a drag > > > > More generally > > > > ([^:(0=]))/\ 5 4 0 0 5 0 3 0 0 0 7 > > 5 4 4 4 5 5 3 3 3 3 7 > > > > > > --- Oleg Kobchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > How about variation on the theme > > > > > > >./\ 3 4 0 0 5 0 6 0 0 0 7 > > > 3 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 > > > > > > > > > --- Dan Bron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Raul wrote: > > > > > drag=: {~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] >./\@:* ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 1{.0{.]) > > > > > > > > Thank you; this is indeed faster; I've replaced my definition with > > > > yours. However, I was hoping for a solution that would complete in > > > > about half the time of the solutions I provided. That is, I'd like a > > > > 2x or 100% speedup; drag is only about 20% faster than drag0 on my > > > > dataset. > > > > > > > > Any other lines of attack? > > > > > > > > -Dan ____________________________________________________________________________________ Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on www.Answers.yahoo.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
