In the argument about tacit or explicit I offer the following verb, comes
from a Black-Scholes algorithm. Lets assume we have the verb cndn. I won't
claim I can't make this tacit, I will claim it won't be easy and or
readable and far more work than I think its worth. And I doubt it will run
any faster.
bsn=: 3 : 0
's x t r v'=.y
|(s,x*^-r*t)-/ .*cndn 1 _1*/~((^.s%x)+t*r(+,-)-:*:v)%v*%:t
)
R.S.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 27 20:27:42 2007
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:27:27 -0500
From: Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 2/27/07, Ralph G Selfridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One possible example is a verb which needs several nouns. Yes I can make it
tacit but I must then extract the noun from the argument in several places.
Not worth it from my prespective.
You mean like this?
explicit=:verb define
a, b, c
)
var=: ". bind
tacit=: 'a'var, 'b'var, 'c'var
--
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
