Programming forum <[email protected]> writes:
>The point is not the number of characters but a
>pattern that is useful in other areas.  In this case
>the pattern is duality.
What makes this case rather special is that, writing p for p: and q for
p:^:_1, we have verbs for which [EMAIL PROTECTED] is identity but [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] is not.  However
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@q  gives a valuable outcome.  Are there other instances of 
the same
sort ?  Roger?

Norman       

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to