It will make it into the language whether or not you fill in the model. I decline to make a dyadic case.
----- Original Message ----- From: Henry Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 14:38 Subject: RE: RE: [Jprogramming] Current time: behaviour To: 'Programming forum' <[email protected]> > I couldn't see how to correct it. If you took Dan's idea > and allowed a left operand to give the time, that would be > a possibility. > > If you're suggesting that this change will make it into > the language if we just fill in the J model with the right code, > I'll think about what that code should look like. Are you? > > Henry Rich > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger Hui > > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:22 PM > > To: Programming forum > > Subject: Re: RE: [Jprogramming] Current time: behaviour > > > > Good point. Why don't you make that point (and > correction) > > on the page? > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Henry Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 14:10 > > Subject: RE: [Jprogramming] Current time: behaviour > > To: 'Programming forum' <[email protected]> > > > > > The test > > > > > > (ts -: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:) 'YYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss.sss' > > > > > > will fail if the time is updated between the reads from the clock. > > > (I don't know if that's possible in the implementation). > > > > > > Henry Rich > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Roger Hui > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 4:43 PM > > > > To: Programming forum > > > > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Current time: behaviour > > > > > > > > So you want to be a language implementer? See: > > > > http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Essays/Timestamp_Extension > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: Roger Hui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 11:25 > > > > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Current time: behaviour > > > > To: Programming forum <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > That's a nice idea. The function, not the dotage. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: Devon McCormick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 11:10 > > > > > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Current time: behaviour > > > > > To: Programming forum <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > A nice extension to "6!:0" would be a format string, > e.g. > > > > > > something like > > > > > > > > > > > > 6!:0 'MM/DD/YY hh:mm:ss' > > > > > > 10/30/07 14:06:13 > > > > > > > > > > > > As has been mentioned before, restricting the argument > now > > > and > > > > > making the > > > > > > above construction an error leaves the door open for a > > > compatible> > > enhancement like this, perhaps when Roger is > in > > > his dotage. > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/30/07, Randy MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...and I fail to see what quality of foreigns > justifies > > > > the domain > > > > > > > restriction. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
