On 11/1/07, Henry Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's not an answer, it's a refusal to answer.
The impression I got is that we could have a different foreign (perhaps 8!:6, since 6!:8 is taken, or perhaps something else) to do date formatting. This could reuse the same underlying formatting code, and would still allow meaningful textual date/time stamps to be easily generated. -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
