(I think this message constitutes a spoiled spoiler..)
On 3/13/08, Roger Hui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What was the solution you anticipated?
I was cleaning up my solution for presentation
purposes, and I ran into a problem:
tclose=: 3 : '{&y^:a:i.#y'
]m=: |.tclose ?.1>.i.10
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0
0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 2 1
0 0 1 1 2 4 2 4 4 2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
_1{|.tclose ?.1>.i.10
7 8 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
({:@{: -: {:@,) m
0
This happens to me in both J601 and J602, and I do not
understand why I was not having this problem earlier,
and I have already overwritten my earlier versions of
my code.
Also, I am now having similar problems with for loops.
Anyways, my basic approach might have been expressed
something like this (except that this does not work)
trmerge=: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@] , [) <@~.@;/. ,[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trinds=: trmerge/@|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
trsum=: <@[ +/@:{~&> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(?.100+i.10) trsum ?.1>.i.10
FYI,
--
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
