Raul Miller wrote:
> I have not read this thread closely enough to know if someone has come
> up with a way of doing this for composite numbers, but since my answer
> agrees with Geoff Canyon's for this specific example, I declare our answer
> "correct".
I agree.
> Note that I "have to" use [: i. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] because i.@<[EMAIL
> PROTECTED] is not equivalent,
> even
> for scalar arguments. (Try this next example both ways to see what I
> mean.)
I get the same result in both cases.
5 ([: +/ ] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ^ 1 + [: i. <[EMAIL PROTECTED])
1000000000000x
249999999997
5 ([: +/ ] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ^ 1 + i.@<[EMAIL PROTECTED]) 1000000000000x
249999999997
Am I missing something?
Best wishes,
John
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
