I always use 5 (<:@[ %~ ] - +/@(#.^:_1)) 1000000000000000000000000000000x 249999999999999999999999999990
It's a little bit faster... On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Dan Baronet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Raul, > why is it not equivalent? I thought [: f g was always the same as [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > > > --- Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [: +/ ] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] [ ^ 1 + [: i. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Note that I "have to" use [: i. <[EMAIL PROTECTED] because i.@<[EMAIL > PROTECTED] is not equivalent, even > > for scalar arguments. (Try this next example both ways to see what I > mean.) > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
