Does the Vocabulary entry for Power need updating for (^:a:) ? The grey
section at the top does not mention n being a: and says that if n is boxed
it must be an atom. a: is a boxed empty list. The exact statement is, "If n is
boxed it must be an atom, and u^:(<m)"

What is the antecedent of "it" in that sentence? Does it mean that the box
must be an atom or the contents of the box must be an atom? The examples
which follow imply that it's the contents. But if it's n that must be an
atom, where is the description of n being a: in the grey area?
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Geoff Canyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Working on a Mac here, so it's actually as easy type ^:a: in the search
> field at the top right of any Finder window. You know, I haven't been happy
> with Apple's file searching since they dropped OS 9 (you used to be able to
> drag a file into the search dialog to specify criteria based on the
> characteristics of that file), but obviously it's up to the task here if I'd
> just remember to use it...
>
>
> On Apr 16, 2008, at 1:06 AM, R.E. Boss wrote:
>
> > Edit|Find in Files
> > tab Help:
> >        Find What:      ^:a:
> >        Look in:        All
> >
> > results in
> >
> > ..\j602\help\dictionary\d202n.htm (6)
> > ..\j602\help\dictionary\special.htm (2)
> > ..\j602\help\jforc\contents.htm (1)
> > ..\j602\help\jforc\foreword.htm (1)
> > ..\j602\help\jforc\loopless_code_v_partitions.htm (5)
> > ..\j602\help\release\powopb.htm (2)
> >
> > or, after Open, in
> >
> > Searched for: ^:a:
> >
> > c:\program files (x86)\j602\help\dictionary\d202n.htm (6)
> > -:@(+2&amp;%)^:a: 1
> > {&amp;x^:a: 0
> > x {~^:a: 0
> > and so on. Then {&amp;x^:a:0 or x{~^:a:0 computes
> > m=. d {~^:a: 0
> >
> > c:\program files (x86)\j602\help\dictionary\special.htm (2)
> > {&amp;x^:a:
> > {~^:a:
> >
> > c:\program files (x86)\j602\help\jforc\contents.htm (1)
> > "Times New Roman";mso-bidi-font-weight:bold&apos;>^:a:</span> and <span
> >
> > c:\program files (x86)\j602\help\jforc\foreword.htm (1)
> > (J5.04) ^:a:,
> >
> > c:\program files (x86)\j602\help\jforc\loopless_code_v_partitions.htm
> > (5)
> > style=&apos;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New
> > Roman";mso-bidi-font-weight:bold&apos;>^:a:</span></span>
> > {~^:a: 0
> > style=&apos;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New
> > Roman"&apos;>u^:a:</span></span>
> > means &apos;keep
> > "Times New Roman"&apos;>u^:a:</span></span> returns all the intermediate
> > results
> > class=Jcode><span style=&apos;mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New
> > Roman"&apos;>{~^:a:</span></span>
> >
> > c:\program files (x86)\j602\help\release\powopb.htm (2)
> > Moreover, the monads {&amp;x^:a: or {&amp;x^:(&lt;_)
> > for integer list x and the dyads {~^:a: or {~^:(&lt;_)
> >
> >
> > R.E. Boss
> >
> >
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:programming-
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Geoff Canyon
> > > Verzonden: woensdag 16 april 2008 9:36
> > > Aan: Programming forum
> > > Onderwerp: Re: [Jprogramming] Is this code reasonable?
> > >
> > > Ah, so it was as I suspected. I had actually read through J for C
> > > programmers, but obviously not everything sank in.
> > >
> > > If only site:jsoftware.com ^:a: worked in google, I could have found
> > > it myself...
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Geoff
> > >
> > > On Apr 16, 2008, at 12:06 AM, Arie Groeneveld wrote:
> > >
> > > > See e.g. Henry Rich's J for C programmers:   *
> > > > http://tinyurl.com/6xcqyj*
> > > >  Extracting Variable-Length Fields Using ^:a: ...
> > > >
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to