I disagree.  I think my statements, 
that number (of hydrogen atoms) is bounded 
by 10^100, and that the number of particles 
is not 10^1000 (much less than 10^1000),
are more correct than yours, that I am "you're not 
even within 0.000...0001% of the right answer",
implying that that numbers are much larger.

Anyway, this is no longer on topic about 
J programming, and I will say no more.



----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Powell <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, April 24, 2009 19:05
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] table of primes to 1,000,000,000 or more
To: Programming forum <[email protected]>

> Roger,
> 
> I'm sorry but I think you're completely wrong. I know nothing 
> about  
> primes, and only a little about the Universe. But, let me 
> suggest,  
> you're not even within 0.000...0001% of the right answer.
> 
> If you're assessing the maximum capacity of our Universe, I 
> defer to  
> your calculations regarding volume, acknowledging that this 
> is  
> something we can speak of loosely, but always, nervously,  
> contemplating GR over our shoulder.
> 
> However, once the volume is established, I suggest that the Bohr 
> atom  
> is not a good choice. If the Universe ever gets anything like 
> full  
> there will not be atoms around. Gravitation will have 
> squeezed  
> everything down to nuclei. There will be something like a sea 
> of  
> particles, some will be recognizable as nuclei (of 
> hydrogen,  
> helium, ... iron etc), but much may just be a mush of 
> protons,  
> neutrons and electrons. As far as I can follow, the process 
> could lead  
> further: for example, a sea of quarks, or string soup. From 
> my  
> reading, those that study these things are contemplating matter 
> in its  
> ground quantum state. Things don't get much denser than that.
> 
> So, even by the most relaxed estimate, I suggest that you're out 
> by  
> about a factor of 2000^3 (the cube of ratio of the diameter of 
> the  
> Bohr Hydrogen atom to the size of its nucleus). For a man of 
> science,  
> Roger, I think you have badly underestimated here.
> 
> But, of course, you'll probably start arguing that a completely 
> dense  
> Universe has lost its capacity to store information. On that 
> question,  
> I defer to Mr. Hawking.
> 
> Mike Powell
> 
> On 24-Apr-09, at 4:00 PM, Roger Hui wrote:
> 
> > These types of "back-of-the-envelope" calculations
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_problem
> > keeps the old ticker sharp, and helps in detecting
> > egregiously erroneous statements like grains of rice
> > on a chessboard (2^n grains on square n) covering
> > the earth to great depth, http://keiapl.org/anec/#rice
> > or 2^60 being larger than the # particles in the universe.
> > http://preview.tinyurl.com/cunwsm
> >
> > For example, having done the calculation
> > (which I probably could have done in my head),
> > I know that the number of particles in the universe
> > is not 10^1000.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jonathan Lettvin <[email protected]>
> > Date: Friday, April 24, 2009 10:42
> > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] table of primes to 1,000,000,000 
> or more
> > To: Programming forum <[email protected]>
> >
> >> I guess my sense of humor is too dry.
> >> I know the godaddy server idea is useless.
> >> But then, calculating a universe
> >> hexagonal close-packed with Hydrogen
> >> struck me as being a bit overboard too.
> >> Just thought I would join in the fun.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Zsbán Ambrus
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Zsbán Ambrus
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> The point is, an average home computer can easily test the
> >> primality> > of any one really huge number in a few moments (and
> >> does too when
> >>>> doing public-key cryptography),
> >>> ...
> >>>> The same is true for factorization,
> >>>
> >>> I'm being a bit imprecise here though, because while a usual home
> >>> computer does do primality tests for public-key cryptography,
> >> I do now
> >>> think it performs prime factorizatoin often.
> >>>
> >>> Ambrus
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to