On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Alan K. Stebbens <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a "better" way to do this?
http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Guides/Lexical%20Closure > Is there a way to define the function result of "foo" as a tacit > function? Closure requires references (names, in J), and tacit programming is [roughly speaking] programming without references. This means that an essential part of any tacit closure implementation will necessarily be a wrapper around some of the critical elements (which must handle references, somehow). -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
