On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:20 PM, June Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > Could you write a purely tacit verb for x&f;._1 y, given that f is a > dyadic verb? I squeezed out a few seeminly possible paths but without > avail.
x&f._1 would be purely tacit I can imagine some different non-trivial variations on this theme, but rather than go into them in any detail, note that you can use <;._1 so you can factor f out of that conjunction. FYI, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
