On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:20 PM, June Kim <[email protected]> wrote: >> Could you write a purely tacit verb for x&f;._1 y, given that f is a >> dyadic verb? I squeezed out a few seeminly possible paths but without >> avail. > > x&f._1 would be purely tacit
I meant a tacit version for ex: ex=: 4 : 'x&f;._1 y,' > > I can imagine some different non-trivial variations on this theme, > but rather than go into them in any detail, note that you can > use <;._1 so you can factor f out of that conjunction. Yes. That might work, as "each" takes x as the argument for verb u. That is, to tacitfy 4 : 'x&f each y' I can use x f each y, with proper ranking given. > > FYI, > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
