On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Raul Miller wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 2:45 AM, bill lam<[email protected]> wrote: > > I suppose the syntax of J has to be changed in order to make your > > proposal feasible. > > > > noun noun verb noun noun > > > > sequence of noun noun is already is a syntax error. Also how does it > > be extended to 5, 6 or more arguments? > > We already have this. > noun verb noun noun > noun noun verb noun noun > noun noun noun noun noun verb noun noun noun noun > > I can construct all of those, but I must use explicit J rather than > tacit J.
I don't believe unless you use similar method as Dan. The parsing stack already rule out 'noun noun' as error. noun noun } noun is valid but it is neither noun noun or noun noun verb noun At any rate Dan's method still use box array and from the point of the verb, there is at most 2 arguments. -- regards, ==================================================== GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24 gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
