c1 =: 2 : 'c2'
c2 =: 2 : 'c3'
c3 =: 2 : 'c4'
c4 =: 2 : 'a5'
a5 =: 1 : '+'
'a' 'b' 'c' 'd' 'e' c1 'f' 'g' 'h' 'i'
+-+
|+|
+-+
+
Henry Rich
bill lam wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Raul Miller wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 9:52 PM, bill lam<[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> We already have this.
>>>> noun verb noun noun
>>>> noun noun verb noun noun
>>>> noun noun noun noun noun verb noun noun noun noun
>>>>
>>>> I can construct all of those, but I must use explicit J rather than
>>>> tacit J.
>>> I don't believe unless you use similar method as Dan. The parsing
>>> stack already rule out 'noun noun' as error.
>>> noun noun } noun
>>> is valid but it is neither noun noun or noun noun verb noun
>> change "verb" to "non-noun" -- they would be adverbs or conjunctions.
>>
>> Hopefully the first case is obvious, as a conjunction, taking
>> arguments x m n and y?
>
> How do you construct the sentence ?
> ^ noun noun noun noun noun non-verb noun noun noun noun $
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
