> Now I have an adverb mc that creates "mutable constants" for tacit verbs:
You could also use mc =: ". bind or mc =: (3 :) (@]) etc.
But now you've come full circle. You're trying to hide explicitness in
tacitness. Why?
What is the advantage of
r3 =: ('d' mc) {~ ] |~ [: # ('d' mc)
over
r1 =: 3 : 'd {~ y |~ #d'
? Why not be up front about explicitness?
-Dan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
