This project looks promising.

I have made some formatting changes to the Vocabulary page. 
http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Vocabulary 
They can be easily reverted if not desirable. (doesn't include bold & italics 
though). The formatting makes the source code for the page quite messy, but 
once the links are finalized the page should be pretty stable so that probably 
won't be too important.

I've added a fourth column for ( {:: ) and ( &.: ) rather than trying to 
squeeze them into 3 (still needs some work). It makes it clearer what is a 
primitive and the columns look neater, but the close relationship between &. 
and &.: is less clear. Anybody prefer 3 columns?

What should we use for the names of the primitive pages? IMO ideally we should 
use the symbols themselves. This seems to work quite well for the majority of 
the primitives - see the page for examples. The exceptions I've noted so far 
are: ( | |. |: . .. /. # ). There may be workarounds (I haven't investigated 
very hard), but if not should we use the English names? For all? Just for the 
exceptions?

After we've sorted out the page naming, some example entries might help suggest 
a design for a wiki page template.

Ric

> From: Devon McCormick
> 
> Sounds good to me.
> 
> On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Brian Schott wrote:
> 
> > Devon, I see your Vocabulary page and that it has been nicely edited.
> > I would like the page to also have the font coloring (bold and
> > italics). What do you and others, think?
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Devon McCormick
> <devon...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I put up a vocabulary page at
> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Vocabularybut
> > > the wiki does some funny things to a few of the entries.
> > >

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to