On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:36 PM, PackRat <pack...@anet.com> wrote: > entries (sometimes numerically superscripted or subscripted). Though > the monadic and dyadic forms of a primitive may be similar or related, > they are still TWO DIFFERENT THINGS and ought to be separated, just as > inflected primitives are separated from each other. (In other words, > "verb y" has a different meaning from "x verb y", just as "verb" and > "verb." and "verb:" have different meanings from each other, though > often related.)
In every dictionary entry I have seen for verbs, the monadic case is treated in a separate definition from the dyadic case. They are on the same page, but that seems within normal practice for dictionaries (which usually have all the definitions for a word on one page). -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
