I have to determine such an F. F is not given. The only known information is
how the values are ordered.

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Henry Rich <[email protected]> wrote:

> You are looking for a solution given any F?
>
> If F is [, no solution is possible.
>
> Henry Rich
>
> Yuvaraj Athur Raghuvir wrote:
> > Dear J Forum,
> >
> > I have an interesting problem for which I need more insights to proceed.
> >
> > I have to determine three unknowns:
> > (a) W where 2 = $W = w1, w2
> > (b) L where 3 = $ L = l1 , l2 , l3
> > (c) F a dyad that takes scalar inputs
> >
> > Such that
> > (6 1 5 2 3 4) -: \:; L F"0 0/ W NB. the order of values is known.
> >
> > For example,
> >     F =: *
> >     (6 1 5 2 3 4) -: \:; L F"0 0/ W  [W =. 3 9 [L =. 20 16 12
> > 0
> >
> > I designed a test that is essentially a blind brute force on the inputs
> > assuming F is given:
> > F =: 4 : 'x^2 - y^2' NB. for example
> > odometer =: #: i.@(*/)
> > test =: 3 : 0
> >  n =. y
> >  w =. odometer n,n
> >  l =. odometer n,n,n
> >  NB. I get a length error if I use bigger inputs. So chunking into 100's
> >  for_i. i. 100 %~ {. $l do.
> >   for_j. i. 100 %~ {. $w do.
> >    b =. ('' -: I. (6 1 5 2 3 4) -:"1 1 (>@[ \:@,"_1@:(F"0 0/"1 1) >@])/
> > (_100{.(100*>:i){. l);(_100{.(100*>:j){. w))
> >    smoutput i,j
> >    if. b<1 do. break. [smoutput 'found it';i;j end.
> >   end.
> >  end.
> >  ''
> > )
> >
> > I am not convinced that I can find a solution this way since the
> functional
> > forms are far too many to be tried out notwithstanding my other
> assumptions.
> >
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Yuva
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to