On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Yuvaraj Athur Raghuvir
<[email protected]> wrote:
> 0: l1 F w1 (Outdoors - Sunny)
> 1: l1 F w2 (Outdoors - Rainy)
> 2: l2 F w1 (Porch - Sunny)
> 3: l2 F w2 (Porch - Rainy)
> 4: l3 F w1 (Indoors - Sunny)
> 5: l3 F w2 (Indoors - Rainy)
>
> and
>
> (l1 F w1) > (l2 F w1) > (l3 F w2) > (l3 F w1) > (l2 F w2) > (l1 F w2)
With this characterization, we could define
l1=: Outdoors=: 1 0 0
l2=: Porch=: 0 1 0
l3=: Indoors=: 0 0 1
w1=: Sunny=: 1 0
w2=: Rainy=: 0 1
M=: 3 2$0
g=: <@,&I.
NB. M=: M (l1 g w2)}~ 0 NB. unnecessary
M=: M (l2 g w2)}~ 1
M=: M (l3 g w1)}~ 2
M=: M (l3 g w2)}~ 3
M=: M (l2 g w1)}~ 4
M=: M (l1 g w1)}~ 5
F=: +/ .* M&(+/ .*) NB. or F=: {&M@<@,&I.
L=: l1,l2,:l3
W=: w1,:w2
With these definitions:
L F"1/ W
5 0
4 1
2 3
Which should not be very surprising because
M
5 0
4 1
2 3
and L and W are identity matrices.
If F (or L or W) need to have other qualities,
this might not be a good approach. So I have
to ask: is this useful to you?
Thanks,
--
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
