True. There is a lot that could be done to make it faster. But it was so much faster I didn't bother. And as you say, if you can't half the time, it's not worth doing. But I did try it. Looks like maybe 20% faster
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 9:18 AM, Roger Hui <[email protected]> wrote: > Slightly more economical to do 1...@#50 or 1...@$50 > instead of ?1e6#50 . > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Don Guinn <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:57 > Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Random Numbers with interation > To: Programming forum <[email protected]> > > > How about 0.07 seconds. > > > > 6!:2 '(1!:2&2)|."1]10{.\:~(>:~.z),.~ #/.~z=.?1e6#50' > > 15 20400 > > 8 20340 > > 46 20287 > > 13 20278 > > 33 20249 > > 39 20220 > > 18 20219 > > 29 20206 > > 25 20197 > > 9 20166 > > 0.0658392 > > > > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:36 AM, smandula > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Thank you kindly for your reply. > > > The statement of one million is an example, could be > > 1,000 or 50,000 > > > iterations. > > > The random numbers being tested could be 1 to 50, or 1 to 100 > > > > > > I have a basic program whereby I enter the maximum iterations, > > in the > > > example 1,000,000 > > > and a time clock starts, and a counter starts counting up to > > the required > > > 1,000,000 intervals. > > > > > > Once, done the time duration shows, in my case 17 minutes, and > > a list of 10 > > > highest occurrences > > > for these random numbers. i.e. > > > number 29 occurrences 204,984 > > > number 26 occurrences 204,855 > > > number 40 occurrences 204,732 > > > number 17 occurrences 204,629 > > > Number 1 occurrences 204,480 > > > > > > I would appreciate any input from the forum, especially for > > faster times > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
