Yes, I know, perhaps I didn't use the right (English) verb when I said "anonymise". What I was getting at was that the expansion of ta appears twice in the fixed verb. It probably doesn't matter anyway, but I thought Bo was trying to avoid such a repetition.
Sorry - this is nearly "chat".... M Raul Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Mike Day <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ta =: [: }: [: {."1 (2 -/\ ])^:a: >> etca =: {.&.:(ta :.ta) >> >> but this doesn't anonymise the involution verb. >> > > etcA=: {.&.:(ta :.ta) f. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
