Hey Raul, I think
5 5#: 0j1 + i.9 0 0j1 0 1j1 0 2j1 1 _2j1 1 _1j1 1 0j1 1 1j1 1 2j1 2 _2j1 makes more sense 5#.(5 5#: 0j1 + i.9) 0j1 1j1 2j1 3j1 4j1 5j1 6j1 7j1 8j1 Cheers, bob On -Aug16-2010, at -Aug16-20109:41 AM, Raul Miller wrote: > Does this make sense? > > 5#:i.9 > 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 > 5#:0j1+i.9 > 0j1 1j1 2j1 _2j1 _1j1 0j1 1j1 2j1 _2j1 > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
