Hm, I think you're right.
I just tried 602 running under WINE on my Linux64 system and it works
fine.

I also tried running it under a virtual Linux32, and the old problem
showed up again.

Funny little bug... why on earth should it behave different under
Linux / *nix? 
 

On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 11:22 -0700, Joey K Tuttle wrote:
> Seems to be a Xnix issue ...
> 
>     version ''
> j504/2005-03-16/15:30
> Running in: Linux
> Linux version 2.4.20-28.8 (bhcomp...@daffy.perf.redhat.com) (gcc 
> version 3.2 20020903 (Red Hat Linux 8.0 3.2-7)) #1 Thu Dec 18 
> 12:53:39 EST 2003
> 
>     0x1
> 2.71828
> 
> ----
> 
>     version ''
> j602/2008-03-03/16:45
> Running in: Linux
> Installer: j602a_linux32.sh
> Engine: j602/2008-03-03/16:45
> Library: 6.02.023Linux version 2.4.20-28.8 
> (bhcomp...@daffy.perf.redhat.com) (gcc version 3.2 20020903 (Red Hat 
> Linux 8.0 3.2-7)) #1 Thu Dec 18 12:53:39 EST 2003
> 
>     0x1
> 2.71828
> 
> 
> -----
> 
>     version ''
> j701/beta/2010-03-31/11:40
> Running in: Linux
> Installer: j701abeta_linux32.sh
> Engine: j701/beta/2010-03-31/11:40
> Library: 7.01.002
> Linux version 2.4.20-28.8 (bhcomp...@daffy.perf.redhat.com) (gcc 
> version 3.2 20020903 (Red Hat Linux 8.0 3.2-7)) #1 Thu Dec 18 
> 12:53:39 EST 2003
> 
>     0x1
> 2.71828
> 
> 
> 
> At 12:04 PM -0400 9/29/10, Devon McCormick wrote:
> >It works OK under 602 on the three different Windows XP systems on which
> >I've tried it.
> >
> >On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Alex Gian <alexg...@blueyonder.co.uk>wrote:
> >
> >>  Yup, funnily enough J501 gets it right too:
> >>    0x1
> >>  0
> >>
> >>  It seems that only 602 has this problem.  0p1 and 0e1 also behave
> >>  correctly under 602.
> >>
> >>
> >>  On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 09:31 +0000, neit...@gaertner.de wrote:
> >>  > bob therriault wrote:
> >>  > >   0x1
> >>  > >2.71828
> >>  > >   9!:14 ''
> >>  > >j602/2008-03-03/16:45
> >>  >
> >>  > Certainly looks like a bug to me.
> >>  >
> >>  >    9!:14''
> >>  > 4.05+GDS changes/Feb 16 2008/19:19:49
> >>  >    0x1
> >>  > 0
> >  > >
> >>  >                                                       Martin
> >  > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to