I can appreciate that position - my motivation for "G is mostly drawn from the Wiki discussion linked earlier (and the Forum messages it references).
But yes, these are all exploratory concepts now. If we're going to redefine " to be more useful, we need some good, realistic motivating examples to decide what would be more useful. Can you think of any, or does your J codebase contain any instances of "( ? -Dan Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device. -----Original Message----- From: Raul Miller <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 07:19:12 To: Programming forum<[email protected]> Reply-To: Programming forum <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Atop u...@v with v of negative monadic rank On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Dan Bron <[email protected]> wrote: > Does anyone see a reason why f may be interested in all the ranks of u > simultaneously*, or have any other comments? I am having problems envisioning any cases where f and h do anything useful. -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
