You mean, u"(monad-case`dyad-case).
Why not? What would the arguments to those verbs be? -Da Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device. -----Original Message----- From: Raul Miller <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 10:07:14 To: Programming forum<[email protected]> Reply-To: Programming forum <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Atop u...@v with v of negative monadic rank On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Dan Bron <[email protected]> wrote: > u"v y <=> u"( mru v&, #$y)y > x u"v y <=> x u"( (lru,rru) v x ,&#&$ y )y This loses the gerund which would have made complete backwards compatibility possible. Do we need the monad and dyad case v to be the same verb? -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
