We can possibly agree that if you send documents that they be categorized as confidential but not ordinary e-mails.
When I worked for IBM pretty much everything was registered as confidential in different ways. We even marked the napkins sometimes as confidential registered and numbered because that is were the best ideas came to light and were scribbled down. I once saw a napkin I had jotted down a design and explained framed on a wall at one colleagues home some years later. 2011/1/12 Ian Clark <[email protected]> > Rarely if ever do you do that, in a large corporation. There are > people with the right to see everything your department outputs. You > have to send to lists whose composition is not under your control, and > can vary by the moment as people get hired or fired. > > I'm sure HR or Payroll, or Finance would refuse to have it that > anything they send to more than one recipient is Public Domain. (A > concept that doesn't exist in England -- where there's hardly any > Common Land even!) > > Anyway, everyone knows that the people you dread most are those in > your own organisation. Americans don't have enemies -- they have > colleagues. > > Sorry, I guess this is Programming, not Chat. I do actually have a > keen interest in dyadic (".)... > > > 2011/1/12 Björn Helgason <[email protected]>: > > I have used e-mail over forty years and my understanding is you do not > need > > to send disclaimers because if you send your message to one person and > one > > person only it is private. > > > > Otherwise it is basically public domain. > > > > If you quote someone you give him credit and if it is from > > a private correspondence you ask permission first > > > > 2011/1/12 Ian Clark <[email protected]> > > > >> >>This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain > >> >>information that is confidential or privileged. Unauthorized use is > >> >>strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended > >> >>recipient, or the person responsible for delivering to the intended > [...] > >> > > >> > Good to know. The tail idiom above may contain copyrighted code and > >> > be restricted to non-commercial use. Unauthorized use is strictly > >> > prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are a commercial user, please > >> > unread this message. > >> > >> For non-USA residents: that's a legal disclaimer, auto-appended more > >> in hope than surety. > >> (The sender can do nothing about it.) > >> It appears there's this Alice-in-Wonderland law that you can't sue for > >> misuse of accidentally released information unless you tell the > >> accidental recipient it's accidentally released. > >> Federal agencies have a more serious problem, because all their output > >> is legally in the Public Domain, for which there is no such thing as > >> misuse. (All they can do to you is disappear you.) > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:21 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I don't think that TABs should be treated different than SPCs > anywhere. > >> > (They are treated the same elsewhere, say, in '17<TABorSPC>+4'.) > >> > I'd classify that as bug. (And it wouldn't be the first mistreatment > >> > of TABs.) > >> > > >> > For a long-term portable solution, you could head or tail into the > >> default: > >> > > >> > {: 77 , ". '' > >> > 77 > >> > {: 77 , ". '4' > >> > 4 > >> > > >> > (You'll find expressions such as y =. {.y,77 here and there in J's > >> > stdlib code.) > >> > > >> > Martin > >> > > >> > PS: > >> > > >> >>This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain > >> >>information that is confidential or privileged. Unauthorized use is > >> >>strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended > >> >>recipient, or the person responsible for delivering to the intended > [...] > >> > > >> > Good to know. The tail idiom above may contain copyrighted code and > >> > be restricted to non-commercial use. Unauthorized use is strictly > >> > prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are a commercial user, please > >> > unread this message. > >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > For information about J forums see > http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >> > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Björn Helgason, Verkfræðingur > > Fornustekkum II > > 781 Hornafirði, > > t-póst: [email protected] > > gsm: +3546985532 > > sími: +3544781286 > > http://groups.google.com/group/J-Programming > > > > > > Tæknikunnátta höndlar hið flókna, sköpunargáfa er meistari einfaldleikans > > > > góður kennari getur stigið á tær án þess að glansinn fari af skónum > > /|_ .-----------------------------------. > > ,' .\ / | Með léttri lund verður | > > ,--' _,' | Dagurinn í dag | > > / / | Enn betri en gærdagurinn | > > ( -. | `-----------------------------------' > > | ) | (\_ _/) > > (`-. '--.) (='.'=) ♖♘♗♕♔♙ > > `. )----' (")_(") ☃☠ > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > -- Björn Helgason, Verkfræðingur Fornustekkum II 781 Hornafirði, t-póst: [email protected] gsm: +3546985532 sími: +3544781286 http://groups.google.com/group/J-Programming Tæknikunnátta höndlar hið flókna, sköpunargáfa er meistari einfaldleikans góður kennari getur stigið á tær án þess að glansinn fari af skónum /|_ .-----------------------------------. ,' .\ / | Með léttri lund verður | ,--' _,' | Dagurinn í dag | / / | Enn betri en gærdagurinn | ( -. | `-----------------------------------' | ) | (\_ _/) (`-. '--.) (='.'=) ♖♘♗♕♔♙ `. )----' (")_(") ☃☠ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
