If the team that deals with bug reports is indifferent to this difference in
version, it might as well stay. If reports of problems can't be considered
serious because of the version running on that hosted server, I favor
upgrading it.
On May 12, 2011 1:36 PM, "Kip Murray" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you, I am not missing anything. As I am only an occasional user and
like
> the server's "portability", I limit my use of J to the server.
>
> On 5/12/2011 11:52 AM, Eric Iverson wrote:
>> I could do so, but it takes a bit of effort and I don't know of any
>> reason to bother. The library updates are mostly of interest to gtk
>> users. The server is intended for casual use and as an example of what
>> can be done.
>>
>> Are you missing something in particular?
>>
>> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Kip Murray<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Is it time to update the J Http Server? Currently,
>>>
>>> J Http Server
>>> JVERSION
>>> Engine: j701/2011-01-10/11:25
>>> Library: 7.01.040
>>> Platform: Linux 32
>>> Installer: j701abeta_linux32.sh
>>> InstallPath: /home/jhs/j701
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
