On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 5:03 PM, I wrote: > serializeNoun=:3 :'5!:5<''y''' ... > modify=:2 :0 > (m,'=.',m,' ',5!:5<'v') ".@, serializeNoun@] > )
serializeNoun already ignores its left argument, so that could have been: serializeNoun=:3 :'5!:5<''y''' modify=:2 :0 (m,'=.',m,' ',5!:5<'v') ".@, serializeNoun ) Or even: modify=:2 :0 (m,'=.',m,' ',5!:5<'v') ".@, 3 :'5!:5<''y''' ) And, given the tradition of languages like C, where the += pattern is supported with only a limited set of operations, perhaps it's fine that this J conjunction only supports a limited class of verbs? -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
