Now that the interpreter is open-source, why don't we start improving it? Roger has said that user contributions could be accepted.
I have more will than time during the school year to work on such things, but I would do my best, and I bet if several others did too we could produce something worthwhile. Can we start talking about it? We would need a development infrastructure, and we would need a goal. I don't know much about the infrastructure part, but I suggest three goals: 1. adding commentary to the existing code 2. adding support for multiple cores 3. adding support for SSE3 instructions Henry Rich ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
