"R.E. Boss" <[email protected]> wrote: > ? b. 0 > > 0 0 0 > > > > ?. b. 0 > > _ 0 0 > > > > Is this intended?
?.10#10 6 5 9 2 4 9 0 7 0 4 ?."0]10#10 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Before 6.02, ?. had rank 0, which caused inconsistent behavior, since "0 should have no effect on a verb that is already rank 0. It is impossible to write a user-defined verb that emulates the behavior of ?. without making its rank infinite. As far as I know, this was the only J primitive that had this kind of behavior. -- Mark D. Niemiec <[email protected]> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
