Raul Miller <rauldmiller <at> gmail.com> writes: > both seem to hit that line. Or did I not understand your question? > That said, now that I think about it, I understand how this was meant > to be used. For example: > names namelist_z_ 0 1 2 3 > Ok... but isn't that the same as list namelist_z_ 0 1 2 3? I appreciate having more than one path to solve a problem. But I am accustomed to more streamlined design/implementation.
What am I missing? Besides the fact that I'm not ignoring the redundant duplicity? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
