2011/10/29 Henry Rich <[email protected]>: > It is true, as I said, that /:~~ produces the same result as /:~ :/: but > it might not perform the same. The monad /:~ is backed by special code, > but when you execute /:~~ you are not executing that monad. Unless > Roger was being unusually thorough, /:~~ would go through dyad /: which > is a different algorithm. You'd have to check timings to see. > > Since what you are executing here is always a monad, /:~ is preferable.
The parser sees /:~~ as (/:~)~ So it's hard to imagine how it could miss the special code for /:~ -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
