To clarify, I do think 13&: could be improved. I think your examples can help with that. I don't find flaws in this modifier very interesting among possible improvement efforts. On Mar 17, 2012 3:45 AM, "Linda Alvord" <lindaalv...@verizon.net> wrote:
> David Ward Lambert pointed out the known pitfall that occurs using : 13 : > > > > Would these examples help in correcting the problem? > > > > why=: 13 :'y+y' NB. wrong > > why > > + > > why 3 > > 3 > > why=: 13 :'y-y' NB. right > > why > > -~ > > why 3 > > 0 > > why=: 13 :'y*y' NB. wrong > > why > > * > > why 3 > > 1 > > why=: 13 :'y%y' NB. right > > why > > %~ > > why 3 > > 1 > > why=: 13 :'y+y+y' NB. wrong > > why > > ] + + > > why 3 > > 6 > > why=: 13 :'y-y-y' NB. right > > why > > ] - -~ > > why 3 > > 3 > > why=: 13 :'y*y*y' NB. wrong > > why > > ] * * > > why 3 > > 3 > > why=: 13 :'y%y%y' NB. right > > why > > ] % %~ > > why 3 > > 3 > > > > Linda > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
