Hi Piotr,
Il giorno gio, 16/06/2011 alle 21.18 +0200, Piotr Praczyk ha scritto:
> I think, the biggest question at the moment is: Do we need to change
> the proposed data-model (Bibobject, BibFiles etc...) to allow
> importation of METS descriptions. I can see several issues with this,
> for example we do not allow arbitrarily nested divisions. just
> document->files
what if this structure is only stored without any interpretation, as a
blob, (adjusting the file identifiers)?
> (with the dimension of versions). How should we deal
> with custom meta-data ? you can enclose arbitrary RDF inside METS,
> while we were so far talking about a dictionary of depth 2 structure.
METS is too much flexible to support it all. If I understand well in the
end, in general you would specify a METS profile that would explicitly
state what kind of feature you are ready to understand (such as not
allowing RDF but just key,values mapping). (I don't know if this is
possible though, Cristian?)
Cheers!
Sam
--
Samuele Kaplun
Invenio Developer ** <http://invenio-software.org/>
