This is an automated notification sent by LCG Savannah.
It relates to:
task #11129, project CDS Invenio
==============================================================================
LATEST MODIFICATIONS of task #11129:
==============================================================================
Update of task #11129 (project cdsware):
Status: Need Info => Cancelled
Open/Closed: Open => Closed
==============================================================================
OVERVIEW of task #11129:
==============================================================================
URL:
<http://savannah.cern.ch/task/?11129>
Summary: intbitset: set iterator test case troubles
Project: CDS Invenio
Submitted by: simko
Submitted on: 2009-09-07 15:27
Should Start On: 2009-09-07 00:00
Should be Finished on: 2009-09-07 00:00
Category: MiscUtil
Priority: 9 - Immediate
Status: Cancelled
Privacy: Public
Percent Complete: 0%
Assigned to: skaplun
Open/Closed: Closed
Discussion Lock: Any
Effort: 0.00
_______________________________________________________
The set iterator test case gives two kinds of troubles on my setup:
a) sometimes, the memory consumption grows and grows, until the test gets
killed:
intbitset - set iterator ... Killed
b) sometimes, the test exits quickly with a failed status:
======================================================================
FAIL: intbitset - set iterator
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./intbitset_tests.py", line 403, in test_set_iterator
self.assertEqual(set1, tmp_set1)
AssertionError: [10, 20] != []
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comments:
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: 2009-10-14 13:32 By: Tibor Simko <simko>
It happened during testing some branches on Gentoo/SLC4/SLC5 boxen. It
happened on one of these boxes, not on all three. But I cannot reproduce it
either now, anywhere. So maybe I was multitasking too much and I have not
upgraded intbitset properly on some box, e.g. not cleaned before rebuilding
from the same AFS sources, or something. It is a possibility.
So, please have a quick glance at the intbitset C code, and if nothing
strikes you there as a potential memory leak, then please close this ticket.
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: 2009-10-14 13:12 By: Samuele Kaplun <skaplun>
I can't reproduce it.
What configuration where you using?
Is this still valid?
_______________________________________________________
Carbon-Copy List:
CC Address | Comment
------------------------------------+-----------------------------
2195 | -COM-
1576 | -SUB-
==============================================================================
This item URL is:
<http://savannah.cern.ch/task/?11129>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by LCG Savannah
http://savannah.cern.ch/
