On 18 Mar 2014, at 17:33, Tibor Simko <tibor.si...@cern.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Pedro Miguel Paiva Gaudencio wrote: >> I gave preference to the other approach, seemed less complex and with >> less post work to do. > > The major drawback of this approach is vulnerability: if this submission > remains open to guests, as most existing INSPIRE submissions are, then > watch for script kiddies playing DoS games, or for some automated script > going mad, etc.
I think both approaches have the same vulnerability? In both cases a recid is generated no matter what - in one case synchronously, in the other case asynchronously. Properly a captcha would be a good idea for INSPIRE submissions? Cheers, Lars > > Best regards > -- > Tibor Simko
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
