Isn't it better to use a simple button in the web UI for record deletion?
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm <[email protected]>wrote: > Am 2013-12-05 um 03:11 schrieb Tibor Simko <[email protected]>: > > > On Wed, 04 Dec 2013, [email protected] wrote: > >> id creation_date modification_date master_format > >> 813 2013-11-15 06:46:15 2013-11-15 06:46:42 marc > > > > OK, this shows that your records well survived the wipe out. I thought > > you mentioned in later discussion that you used > > wipe_out_record_from_all_tables()? If so, it should have deleted entry > > in bibrec table. Since the entry is still there, the record may appear > > in searches, depending on its MARCXML content. Maybe it was not deleted > > after all? > > Maybe; I used the function but maybe I forgot some IDs. > > At the moment I see a different problem: Seems like I deleted the files of > nearly all active records in my tries. Still investigating. > > > > >> 2013-12-04 18:16:06 --> Stage 2 failed: Error while elaborating FFT > tags: MoreInfo: No document of a given name associated with the record > >> 2013-12-04 18:16:06 --> <record> > >> <controlfield tag="001">1058</controlfield> > >> <datafield tag="FFT" ind1=" " ind2=" "> > >> <subfield code="n">Бала_бакча_тарбиячыларга_материал_2</subfield> > >> <subfield code="t">EXPUNGE</subfield> > >> </datafield> > >> </record> > > > > The error is printed, but I think the document is well expunged. Just > > made a quick test on Invenio/master to confirm this: > ... > > So expunging worked actually, even though an error was printed along the > > process. > > I'll submit a ticket about this. > > Thank you for the effort! > > Greetlings, Hraban -- ------------------------- Mureşan Bogdan Inginer de sistem Facultatea de Ştiinţe Politice, Administrative şi ale Comunicării – Cluj Napoca (004) 0788 94 11 65 (004) 0737 25 88 33 -------------------------
