Hello, (Technically, the "Agreement with..." is not even part of the Constitution, so it can be removed without unanimity of the Constitutive members. As such so Loic's vote, as reply to Vincent's proposal, is sufficient to do it)
The way I see it, it does not really matter whether any specific agreement or disagreement with any provider exists. The point was only to say that Gna! belongs and is to be 100% under management of the people that maintains it and no one else, specifically not anyone that currently provides hardware or bandwith, even if legal liability arised. I guess I do not need to remind anyone here that moral contract, in this regard, was proven insufficient when an entity, supposedly highly trustworthy in first place, took over a similar platform and claimed ownership regarding provided (renewed) hardware and bandwidth. But, as, anyway, the Constitution itself (especially articles 2 and 5) prevent such mess, I guess that's fine to remove it completely, I assume it is crystal-clear to anyone that no hardware or bandwidth provider cannot make any claim (except regarding hardware and bandwidth, obviously). So it's your call. Regards, And merry christmas/happy new year! :) -- Mathieu Roy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Project mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/project
