I second the idea to opening mozdev to licenses which require source code to be open, but disallow its reuse. What constitues reuse? I don't know, I'm not a lawyer. But clearly there's a definition (look at the whole SCO / System5 / Linux legal battle)
--- David Boswell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Feel free to discuss options for changes to the terms of use on this > list or open a bug and we can track comments there. If there is a > general consensus for a change, we're certainly open to updating it. > > David > > > > Which then leads to the next question: does MozDev want to limit > > itself > > to "open source" projects, or include all "freely distributable" > > software? If there are concerns about code safety, perhaps MozDev > > could > > require that source code also be distributed, but not require > > automatic permission for derived works? > > _______________________________________________ > Project_owners mailing list > [email protected] > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners > _______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
