[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > *Scott* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > >A month ? 90 days?< > > I think 30 days is sufficient to cover the people who might (1) go on > holiday and not check email and (2) have a backlog of emails to read > before following up. But that's just my personal opinion and no more > important than anyone else's. > > > >And I wasn't the only one that tried to get a hold of > the developer and he never replied to them. Didn't reply to bug reports > since 2005. The guy simply uped and left.< > > This is irrelevant to me. Mozdev should be the one doing the > contacting of the project owner, not you or other users.Your email > might have made it straight to his spam folder for all we know. > So could yours :)
> I see you've overlooked my comments about: > > 1. stable projects which, due to their maturity and their original > goals having been met, have little or no further activity Obviously projects that have no bugs and no other issues woudln't be part of the adoption process ----- the only ones that would qualify would be bug riddled and no developer around. > 2. differences of opinion on goals/directions that a project should > take, leading to an aggressive project owner trying to wrest control > of a project from a project owner who believes his project is > stable/mature and does not need further development If the project has active bugs that are not being dealt with that should show the lack of active development not a stable project > 3. a project owner's nefarious attempts to take over a competing (but > inactive) project There is always that possibility.. > > Eric H. Jung > FoxyProxy Project Owner > PasswordMaker Project Owner > Swarm Project Owner > Ok so amend the adoption policy.......... 1) Must have active bugs, active for more then 6 months, that have not been dealt with by any project member. EG; bugs that cripple the addon due to FF/TB version changes. Excluded projects will be stable ones without any active bugs. We could add a 3rd page that lists these projects. How ever maybe a trove map for mozdev would be a better approach. -- Scott _______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
