One problem I do have with the AddOn Update manager when it notifies me on starting FireFox, is that I use the SwitchProxy plugin, but - at that point - haven't had the opportunity to provide my proxy password, so the update fails at that stage (Tools/Add-Ons/Update works), but that's just because I happen to use the SwitchProxy plugin too.
Steve Ezequiel Calderara wrote:
As user point of view... i really would like to see the changelog next to each update request... i prefer to see the changelog there, than clicking the website, navigate thru it and find what i want...and about the style of the changelog, non styled changelog would be great... or a common style for every changelog...well... just an opinion... byesOn 9/10/07, *Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:Adam Kowalczyk wrote: > Michael Vincent van Rantwijk, MultiZilla wrote: >> Matthew Wilson wrote: >> >>> Just noticed that the following bug has been fixed: >>> >>> "Extension updates should link to further information" >>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297903 >>> >>> Mockup UI for the bug: >>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=277934 >>> >>> Looks interesting for extension developers for FF3. >>> >>> Matthew >>> Interesting, but I didn't get this in the newsgroup until now, after 6 or 7 hours, but you'll find my reply to Adam per e-mail below: Hi Adam, First of all, I don't see your reply in the newsgroup thus I reply directly to you per e-mail. >> What is so interesting? Everything should go into one shitty tiny >> little extension manager, which is everything but a browser window? >> What about just adding a link instead, if that's not enough... well >> nothing is. Also, the average Mozilla Firefox user gives a peep about >> this kind of bloat, because that's what it is. >> > > Why are you so negative? That's fair criticism, really. For example: You install add-on X but won't get to see a list with features when you install this add-on, and thus will have to *rely on visiting a website*. Tell me, what is the logic here? > What exactly is "shitty" about the extension > manager? I don't think this kind of rhetoric is very helpful. Please, don't take things literally and tear the real issue apart from it! What I meant to say, and that should have been clear to you, is that *it isn't a browser window*. The EM only has a really *small window* for this kind of info, but what if I need screen shots to make things clear? Also, nobody should ever force you to step back in 1985 stylish ways. Just load the page in a tab, and close it after reading it. Easy done. We do that for years already. > I don't > see how this news isn't "interesting" either, because it's certainly > something that impacts extension authors. Impact isn't always a good thing, the latest changes for updates which enforces people to set prefs or hack updates.rdf and what not is such an example. Why? Because mossup worked on this bug instead of fixing the darn documentation and writing the tools we need to support this new feature. Now is that fair, to let people wait any longer? > Anyway, I reckon it's a good idea. I think we can all agree that there's > been a need to have a way to learn more about the new versions when > updating. Many times I would go to AMO or to the extension's homepage > and manually look for the changelog. As for displaying the information > inline in the EM, I wouldn't call that bloat. Sorry, but it _is_ bloat. That's not what the EM is for. Providing a light weight URL is far better. > Providing the user with a > link is a lighter alternative but it's also less convenient. You have to > open the page, leave the EM, close the tab once you're done and bring > the EM back up. Oh, so clicking a simple link is less convenient? Something people do that all day long, yet it is less convenient? Wait, you'll have less space and have to click to read this in this little browser part of the EM, right. Now that's convenient, not so IMHO. > The markup is going to be sanitized and limited to just > a couple of the basic tags (<h1>, <ul>, <b> etc.) and it seems to fit > quite well, even in the "tiny little" EM window. Oh, more limitations for add-on authors. Less is good, right? Gone with your screen shots et all. Now that's convenient, right? You sir are obviously missing a great part of the message, as in how do you get people to YOUR website now? That is far more important to many people! I may sound harsh, but really, that's not my intention. English is just not my mothers tong and that makes it a little harder to express myself more clearly. Thank you for your understanding. Kind regards, Michael > Cheers, > Adam -- Michael Vincent van Rantwijk - MultiZilla Project Team Lead - XUL Boot Camp Staff member (ActiveState Training Partner) - iPhone Application Developer _______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list Project_owners@mozdev.org <mailto:Project_owners@mozdev.org> http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners -- ______ Ezequiel. Http://www.ironicnet.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list Project_owners@mozdev.org http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
-- Steve Parker http://steve-parker.org/sh/sh.shtml http://nixshell.wordpress.com/ This space intentionally has nothing but text explaining why this space has nothing but text explaining that this space would otherwise have been left blank, and would otherwise have been left blank. v4sw5UCHhw5ln4pr6Pck2/5ma8u7$LSBw2DGm5g/l7ADLUSi2e6t4b8SRADHMen6g4r5p-6/-5 hackerkey.com
<<inline: changelog.gif>>
_______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list Project_owners@mozdev.org http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
