> > For me, Subversion was the system I checked. TurtoiseSVN is the windows > client I learned to love :D In my opinion WinCVS is harder to use, too. >
I concur. Some of the reasons I like the Subversion/TortoiseSVN combination: * Subversion uses a conceptually very simple scheme for branching and tagging - branches and tags are created by copying a snapshot to a new directory. Not as efficient as other schemes, perhaps, but in these days of 250 GB disk drives, that's not much of a concern for me. * Directories, as well as files, are version controlled with Subversion, which is a significant improvement over CVS. * Each commit into an Subversion repository creates a new revision for the entire project, not just for one file. This can be good or bad depending on your perspective, but I've come to prefer it. * Text and binary files are treated the same, so no need to identify a file as binary when you add it. * TortoiseSVN is implemented as a windows shell extension, so it's integrated into the Windows Explorer file manager which is extremely convenient Charles _______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
