Thanks everyone for their contributions so far. I have done a raw dump of what I have found so far:

http://www.mozdev.org/drupal/wiki/AMO-Making-Things-Better

If I missed something let me know, or just edit the page and add yourself. Keep the ideas coming. I will clean it up and add more content soon.

- Brian

Brian King wrote:
There has been a lot of talk about this in recent threads, so I have a proposal.

The upcoming Firefox Summit has a few AMO talks on the schedule:

http://wiki.mozilla.org/Summit2008/Sessions/Schedule

One of them is titled just AMO: Editorial Process, which I believe will be a banging of heads to come up with ways to improve things. This is one of the high priorities at AMO.

So what I would like you to do is reply to this post with your ideas on how to improve the process. I will then compile a list and present it at the summit. I might also blog about it. Even if some of the ideas are followed through on, that would be a step in the right direction.

Put your ideas into 3 separate categories:

1) General : What the pain points are for you, and a proposal on how to fix/improve. Let's focus on the review process, but site bugs can be included. 2) Feature Requests : Things you would like to see (or removed) on the site.
3) Mozdev ties : Ideas on how Mozdev could integrate with AMO.

Guidelines:

- Be constructive!
- Keep each entry short. One liners where possible.
- Cite bugs if they exist.
- Do not follow-up on any ideas proposed, especially to knock it down. The exception might be to clarify a broken link or cite a bug. You can open a new thread if you like to start a discussion on a particular feature. Let's work on the assumption that all ideas are good ideas for now.

Thanks,
- Brian


_______________________________________________
Project_owners mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners

Reply via email to