Hi

I've spent the past few weeks working on creating a model using Project 
Chrono to place bounds on a rather catastrophic failure mode in an electric 
scooter I have purchased. The project has given me some reasonable results, 
and is a more in-depth description is available on the project's Github 
page: https://github.com/keonjoe/Nami-Simulator

There is still some work to be done on the correlation side and tweaks to 
the contact model to be made. In this regard, I do have a few questions:

   1. Could somebody please comment on how accurate the standard Hertzian 
   contact model has been for handling the vertical forces (i.e. from hitting 
   a sharp bump) from tire-road contacts? Are there any recommendations for 
   how to tweak the contact model to better approximate the behavior of a tire 
   over a bump if the Hertzian contact model is not a good fit for this 
   application?
   2. I noticed that when using a lower stiffness value for the 
   ChElementBeamIGA elements I used to create a part in my model that some 
   spurrious low frequency oscillations are present. When I was working at GT 
   helping customers troubleshoot these types of issues in their models, the 
   solution was usually to increase the alpha term in the material Rayleigh 
   damping model. However, I noticed in the comments in the code that it is 
   not possible to apply the alpha Rayleigh damping term. Is there an 
   explanation for why this cannot be done for ChElementBeamIGA? Surely there 
   is a mass matrix being assembled at some point in the solution process on 
   which the alpha term can be applied.

Thank you in advance for your help!

Qiyuan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ProjectChrono" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/projectchrono/5263e0a8-e0d7-46ea-a836-0ade0ca12f78n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to