http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/opinion/from-sumatra-to-papua-in-2011-rule-by-law-again-trumped-the-rule-of-law/488104
>From Sumatra to Papua, in 2011 Rule By Law Again Trumped the Rule of Law
Nurkholis Hidayat | December 31, 2011

 'The law has become an instrument for the government to legitimize its 
actions.'


The current state of Indonesian law prompts me to question once again whether 
the rulers (the investors, political oligarchy, the majority) are the law, or 
whether the law is the ruler. 

This question comes to the fore because a number of incidents and human rights 
cases in 2011 appear to show that the legal and political conditions in 
Indonesia have suffered a significant decline. 

To try to answer the question, I would first like to start with the defiance 
against the law that has taken place throughout the years — and that, 
ironically, has been one of the hallmarks of the government. 

Disobedience is usually thought of as a term used to describe citizens. While 
the motivation for defying the law may vary, it is often a conscious rejection 
of a legal system that has been deemed unfair or oppressive. In other words, it 
is a decision made by someone who has a critical legal consciousness and is not 
a result of ignorance of legal matters. 

In Indonesia, however, disobedience is often practiced by lawmakers and law 
enforcers themselves — the very people in the business of creating a society 
based on law and order. 

The mayor of Bogor refused to abide by the verdict of the Supreme Court in the 
case concerning the judicial review sought by the GKI Yasmin church. The 
president and the education minister both refused to respect the Supreme Court 
verdict that declared the National Examination as violating the right to 
education. The health minister, the Food and Drug Agency (BPOM) and the Bogor 
Institute of Agriculture all refused to comply with a Supreme Court verdict 
demanding that they announce the name of formula milk tainted by bacteria. 

This sort of defiance of the law is not a statement against injustice; it is an 
obstruction of justice. The supremacy of law is diminished, as is the trust 
people have in the legal system. The principles of a state of law are being 
held in contempt. 

Human rights have regressed in 2011, particularly in the areas of religious 
freedom, the right to organize, the right to housing and the right to a fair 
trial. 

At the start of the year, we were jolted by the Cikeusik tragedy in which 
intolerance, hatred and violence prevailed over logic as mobs killed members of 
the Ahmadiyah community. All year, Ahmadis in Indonesia have continued to face 
threats, attacks, violence, the closure of places of worship, damage to 
property and forced evictions. All this while the government, the House and the 
judicial institutions have failed to protect them or their constitutional 
rights. 

Other religious minorities face a similarly dangerous climate as groups 
preaching intolerance are free to spread their hatred through the media. 

In the labor sector, the dominant cases involved violation of the rights of 
workers and the freedom to organize. The Jakarta Legal Aid Foundation (LBH 
Jakarta) received reports of 12 cases of muzzling of labor unions. Labor union 
activists have been threatened with dismissals, suspension and transfer and 
their offices shut down. Workers at Carrefour, Asiatex, Perusahaan Listrik 
Negara, Dok dan Koja Bahari and Indofood Sukses Makmur were all hit by the 
criminalization of labor unions. 

Workers filed reports alleging criminal behavior by the entrepreneurs and labor 
supervisors they were fighting. The reports were pushed aside by police. 

This year has seen a rising number (24) of violations pertaining to fair trial. 
Arbitrary arrest and detention, torture and case manipulation are becoming a 
pattern. Violators include police, non-state actors such as intolerant groups 
and entrepreneurs, prosecutors, and the court system itself. 

Although the number of forced evictions decreased in 2011, there has been no 
fair settlement of disputes over urban spaces involving the poor. The 
government’s policy of taking inventory of its assets is implemented widely 
without consideration for state housing occupants, as guaranteed by law. 

A number of government ministries and state enterprises forcefully evicted 
occupants without providing an adequate or fair solution. Pawnshop operator 
Perum Pegadaian, train operator KAI, electricity provider PLN, a number of 
ministries such as home affairs and defense and the Indonesian Armed Forces 
were involved in forced evictions. 

Meanwhile, in Papua, arbitrary arrests, torture and killings continued 
unabated. The government and security personnel are muzzling the Papuan people 
by accusing anyone and everyone of plotting against the state. At least 29 
people have been sentenced for political reasons, with sentences ranging from 
11 months to life. Most were involved in the raising of the Morning Star flag, 
and the rest were peaceful protesters. 

In Papua, the law does not rule. The rulers are guns and the vast might of the 
wealthy. The revelation that there was Freeport money flowing into the pockets 
of the police and soldiers only served to throw the situation into sharp 
relief. 

Toward the end of the year, the atrocities committed against farmers in Mesuji 
in Sumatra came to public attention and snowballed with other similar cases 
that appeared to have taken place in other parts of the country. 

The expansion of palm oil plantations, often the result of corrupt practices 
involving permit-issuing local rulers and greedy capital owners, has led to 
vicious human rights violations — from the destruction of houses and crops to 
outright murder — by security forces and law enforcers on the companies’ 
payrolls. 

The democratic transition in Indonesia has clearly resulted in a complex 
alliance between the military, the wealthy and fundamentalists. The current 
regime has been integrating this alliance by sustaining a political, judicial 
and economic infrastructure that exists to benefit all three. 

Amid these political transactions lies the power of President Susilo Bambang 
Yudhoyono and the political parties. The agenda of the government and the House 
of Representatives is to service and accommodate their interests, while the 
interests of the people are placed far lower. 

Several draft laws pushed by civil society, aimed at putting some order into 
the judicial system and promoting human rights, have faced obstruction and 
continue to be excluded from the list of the House’s priority draft laws. This 
has happened with the draft laws on the Protection of Domestic Workers, on the 
revision of the Law on Human Rights Court, the ratification of international 
anti-torture protocols as well as the migrant workers’ legal package. 

The political oligarchy has made cabinet reshuffling meaningless. The president 
has ignored public calls to get rid of fundamentalist and self-interested 
factions. The political oligarchy has also turned the process of succession in 
so-called independent state institutions such as the Corruption Eradication 
Commission (KPK) into a game of interest trading and political alliances. 

The selection of judges for the Supreme Court has been similarly compromised. 
The political oligarchy has become a serious threat to the independence of the 
judicial system. The judiciary should be untouched by the influence, threats 
and pressures of politics and power. A political system that engages in 
transactions concerning the independence of the judiciary becomes a threat to 
the notion of an Indonesia based on the rule of law. 

We can rightly conclude, then, that what is happening is not a case of the law 
as king, but instead of the kings as law. What is happening is the rule by law, 
and not the rule of law. The law has become an instrument for the government to 
legitimize its actions while the fundamental rights of citizens are not only 
violated but also ignored. 

Nurkholis Hidayat is director of the Jakarta Legal Aid Foundation (LBH Jakarta).

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Post message: [email protected]
Subscribe   :  [email protected]
Unsubscribe :  [email protected]
List owner  :  [email protected]
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke